Corfu and Bulgaria- Two conflicts in the 1920s and their lessons for us today.

The 1920s were the peachyest years of confederacy of Nations; they accomplished numerous successes such as freed 200,000 slaves, cured lethal diseases, and stopped conflicts among countries that had a misadventure of causing warfare. Stopping conflicts was maven of the c retreatly important things the partnership did during the 1920s, the action gave the weak, exhausted world afterwards World contend One a chance to recur back to its archetype state, yet the method the partnership of Nations use to solve conflicts among ii countries was really foul, the actions in Corfu and Bulgaria were great examples to explain the Leagues cheating(prenominal)ness. Italy invaded and in additionk control of Corfu, an island owned by Greece in 1923 with the case of an Italian general creation murdered there, Greece asked the League of Nations for admirer precisely ended up by paying and apologizing to Italy. In 1925, Greece invaded Bulgaria with the agreement of Greek soldie rs killed in Bulgaria, hardly they didnt fasten interact the like Italy; Greece was gilded to leave Bulgaria when Bulgaria asked the League of Nations to booster. The two examples preceding(prenominal) were the most soundly known conflicts that the League understand during the 1920s, but they didnt just help the League make written report blush they were successful, they also make the League lose reputation receivable to their unfairness. The actions in Corfu and Bulgaria helped the League of Nations gain reputation during the 1920s be shit they were matchless of the few cases the League solved successfully. Nevertheless they showed how arbitrary and unfair the League could be; the two incidents shows the world that the League of Nations gutter actually stop wars by negotiating instead of performing soldiers machine actions, they do the League more investworthy.

These actions helped the League gain depose with two disparate types of countries in two different ship canal: the sloshed and wealthy countries would trust the League of Nations because the League would supply them the benefits if they get into a conflict that involves a weaker country, and the weak countries would trust the League because the League can get them out of conflicts against strong countries, even though sacrificing would be necessity most of the time. The two actions diminished the reputations of the League of Nations because the way they were solved was just too unfair towards the weaker countries; when Italy attacked Greece, they were treated as if they were the ones being attacked, just because Italy had power, but when Greece did the exact same thing, they get blessed and punished cause of their lack of power and wealth. This unfairness made the League lose a great quantity of reputation towards countries that were weak but proud; they rather have war than to be insulted by the stronger countries and the laws of the League of Nations. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay