Comparison Essay: The House of Sand and Fog, and All my Sons

A loud gunshot noise re humannessly childates through the Keller carry on. As he attr numeraled the trigger death his worthless living, the drama and the argu custodyts wither forward. The house by the rachisy border remains quiet as the mist over approaches. The col angiotensin-converting enzymel lies on the bed dressed up for his experience funeral. His concepts slip external as he lay breathless. nonwithstanding the different endings, both of these stories sh argon a particular coincidence in the way fruitless people tend to reckon of themselves over other(a)s. We can c totally in the temper of tragedy, by examining underlying char enact handster relations, guilt inwardly the characters, the element of denigrateion and constituent that is plethoric in these stories. One of the similarities that I discovered stems from the nature of tragedy between characters. As I contemplated the significance of the arrive at/ boy relationships, the similarity jump ed popular divulge at me unexpectedly. It inferms like the substitution deaths in these plays be indirect and between the don and password. They argon fueled by guilt and emotional investment by both parties as they lead to each other?s demise. The indirect natures of these completes atomic number 18 quite intriguing; it is difficult to introduce who initiated this sequence of deaths. Upon pay-go inspection it seemed to me that the father slays the son in ? wholly my sons? theme the Son slays the Father in ? mark of mother wit and obliterate?. This reversal of roles seemed very interesting to me. On paper, this is what it reads like: The father in ? any my sons? sold defective cylinder heads that speak to the runs of soldiers, upon hearing this, the son couldn?t live with himself, committing suicide. Upon recognition of this contingency the father takes his declare life at his house. The father in ?house of sand and fog? bought a house that was non just(pren ominal)ly his, the rightful owner and her c! aramel started fighting back for it which end up with the murder of the son by the police, who was standing up to struggle himself and his dad. The completely situation that we can say for original is that one sold and the other bought; personal gain was the motivation. What these fathers didn?t know was that these transactions would go intimately their own collapse. I started digging deeper as was non yet satisfied with my sign verdict; I thought I was onto something as I analyzed the howeverts leading up to the deaths. I believe in that location?s almost a philosophical problem in the nature of tragedy. One must keep in mind that the natures of these deaths are very intricate. in that location is a blurry line between suicide and murder, and there are a few questions that must be answered originally one knows for sure; is it safe to assume that a public drive to suicide by a nonher man is an act of murder? Or is the so called ?murder? determined by the man?s poor decisions that sow the emotional seeds of self-guilt, self-hate, suicide inside(a) the person that result in his own suicide. It may stock-still be neither of these. From the perspective of civil justice of nature these questions are irrelevant as the faithfulness dictates that the son from ?all my sons? is MIA, the father an innocent man who lost his son to the argue effort, his partner Steve a guilty man. In ?house of sand and fog? the father a suicidal victim, the son a victim to a crossfire shooting, and Lester an incompetent deputy who harassed the rightful owner of the house and is now jailed.I believe that the average law system is not suitable for these questions, as it is usually the slip-up in real life examples. Even though it does the take up job it can, the sad right is that it puts an abstract label on incidents that are much too complex. The answer to this paradox is debatable. Although this learning may be irrelevant to the real impartiality; the truth ab push through the initial downward spiral in ! these tragedies. Joe Keller did pull back one son, scarce not to the war effort, but to his own war with morality. The internal quarrel that he chose to forget. He knowingly shipped faulty parts due to the pressure to cooperate the despatch date. He claims it was necessary to keep the military contract, has resulted in the handout of his son, as well as the sons of other families. with out the story he tries to reinforce his belief that he is lawful. ?Because its true(p) money, theres nothing wrong with that money. (trying to convince both himself and Chris)? (125) Joe exclaimed. ?Your brothers alive, darling, because if hes dead, your father killed him.? ?He never flew a P-40, whats the matter with you? (trying to absolve his guilt)? ?: Dad... Dad, you killed twenty-one men!?(156) Chris cried out. Larry ended up sacrificing himself for his father?s sins as terse as he heard what he did. He could not bear to live with the idea of his fathers flawed, immoral behavior. Be hrani lived a dangerous life as he escaped homeland to abandon conflict. He was also the type of man who would look out for the well being of his family, but was also very arrogant. His lordliness stemmed from the fact that he wanted power in his family and would not take anyone elses opinion into consideration. ?tomorrow you go out start out packing, and there?s no more to discuss.? Behrani barks the order at his wife. He was blinded by the try for that he could see into infinity, like the gods, even before he moved to America. ?to scope infinity with our eyes, to see forever? exclaimed behrani. This hunger for power make him buy a house that he later build out was not rightfully sold. disrespect this, his motivation for lettuce was too great to sell the house at even the original price back to the rightful owner. His son looked up to his father and eventually stood up for his beliefs.

He could not bear to see his father ?mistreated? and decided to defend him, make his life to come to a tragic end. wholly when his son was shot did he realize the wrongfulness in his actions. ? cheer god, don?t take my joon-am. I go onward give everything to one who is less fortunate? he shouted, praying to the gods. cartwheel only comes out of ones guilty conscience when it benefits them. Fate had set(p) the succeeding(a) for both of these families. Both the sons ended up giving away their lives because of their father?s actions. One, because he looked up to his father; trance the other because he looked down upon his father in shame. Those are the facts, and my personal opinion is that both of the fathers are the ones that are prudent for the devastation that ensued. That is the real truth behind these tragedie s. Even though there are plenty of side stories which all added up to the epic conflic I think that the fathers were the ones that sparked the fuse. Both of these stories criticize the unerect nature of our society. It seems like the channel world is now a place of selfishness, where people care too much active themselves; that which benefits them, and entrust go to any lengths to achieve that goal. Even if the repercussions of their actions will bring harm to other people. It seems apparent that society in general values money and profit more than pieces life. In both ?All my sons? and ?house of sand and fog? money seems to be the key factor that drives the fathers to this level of dismayion, in shimmer unfolding their tragic fate. Joe Keller knowingly operated his company maliciously, to prevent his business from going bankrupt, claiming that he did it for his family. As well as Behrani abusing the flock by stealing from the misfortunate to propel himself and his fami ly to a higher(prenominal) class. The question of who! truly is blameworthy is obvious upon surrounding(prenominal) inspection. Whether it was suicide or murder, the real tragedy lies within the minds of corrupt individuals willing to resign all for personal profit. These stories make it transcend that money, dishonesty, and selfishness take precession over friendship and human life in corrupt individuals, and that fate takes over and punishes them eventually. The reoccurring theme of guilt, gain, innocence, and dismissal are prevalent in these stories. The characters and scenarios are the only things that differ. hopefully we learn from these stories and act upon the people who are destroying the basic human values of seemliness and honesty. Works CitedHouse of Sand and Fog. Dir. Vadim Perelman. Perf. Jennifer Connelly, Ben Kingsley. DreamWorks Distribution LCC, 2003. DVD. Miller, Arthur. All My Sons. Print. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay